Flap perfusion assessment with indocyanine green angiography in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Wang Zhaojian1,Jiao Ling2,Chen Siliang2,Li Zhijin1,Xiao Yiding1,Du Fengzhou1,Huang Jiuzuo1,Long Xiao1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing People's Republic of China

2. Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu People's Republic of China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIndocyanine green angiography (ICG‐A) has been widely applied for intraoperative flap assessment in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. However, the beneficial effect of ICG‐A in DIEP flap breast reconstruction is still uncertain and no standardized protocol is available. This study aims to analyze the clinical outcome and comprehensively review protocols of this field.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases until September 15, 2022. Studies on the utility of intraoperative ICG‐A in DIEP breast reconstruction were included. Data reporting reconstruction outcomes were extracted for pooled analysis.ResultsA total of 22 studies were enrolled in the review, among five studies with 1021 patients included in the meta‐analysis. The protocols of ICG‐A assessment of DIEP flap varied among studies. According to the pooled results, the incidence of postoperative fat necrosis was 10.89% (50 of 459 patients) with ICG‐A and 21.53% (121 of 562 patients) with clinical judgment. The risk for postoperative fat necrosis was significantly lower in patients with intraoperative ICG‐A than without (RR 0.47 95% CI 0.29–0.78, p = .004, I2 = 51%). Reoperation occurred in 5 of 48 patients (10.42%) in the ICG‐A group and in 21 of 64 patients (32.82%) in the control group summarized from reports in two studies. The risk for reoperation was lower in the ICG‐A group than in the control group (RR 0.41 95% CI 0.18–0.93, p = .03, I2 = 0%). Other complications, including flap loss, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, mastectomy skin necrosis, and infection, were comparable between the two groups. Heterogeneities among studies were acceptable. No significant influence of specific studies was identified in sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsICG‐A is an accurate and reliable way to identify problematic perfusion of DIEP flaps during breast reconstruction. Protocols of ICG‐A differed in current studies. Intraoperative ICG‐A significantly decreases the rate of fat necrosis and reoperation in patients undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction. The synthesized results should be interpreted sensibly due to the sample size limitation. RCTs on the outcomes and high‐quality studies for an optimized ICG‐A protocol are still needed in the future.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3