Affiliation:
1. California Franchise Tax Board, (Retired) Sacramento California USA
2. Georgetown University Law Center Washington District of Columbia USA
3. U.S. Department of the Treasury Washington District of Columbia USA
Abstract
AbstractMany U.S. states and countries around the world use non‐monetary sanctions, including public disclosure, license suspension, and withholding of other government‐provided benefits or privileges, to encourage tax compliance. Little is known about the effectiveness of these programs. Using administrative tax microdata from California's “Top 500” program, we study whether notices warning of the imminent publication of a taxpayer's personal information and potential license suspension affect payment and other compliance outcomes. Exploiting variation over time in the cutoff balance for program eligibility, we find evidence of strong positive compliance responses to the program. We also develop estimates of the long‐run revenue and social‐welfare effects of the program. Together, these results suggest that non‐monetary sanctions can be efficient tax enforcement tools, at least among the relatively high‐income population we study.
Reference45 articles.
1. AB 1418 Chapter 716 (Cal. Stat.2006).http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05‐06/statute/ch_0701‐0750/ch_716_st_2006_ab_1418
2. AB 1424 Chapter 455 (Cal. Stat.2011).http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11‐12/bill/asm/ab_1401‐1450/ab_1424_bill_20111221_status.html
3. WHAT MOTIVATES TAX COMPLIANCE?
4. Culture, compliance, and confidentiality: Taxpayer behavior in the United States and Italy