How glaucoma patients balance between the advantages and disadvantages of acceptance to the recommended treatment regimen in real‐life: Perspectives from a middle‐income country

Author:

Motta Guilherme Samomiya1,da Costa Andrade Julia1,Kasahara Niro12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil

2. Department of Ophthalmology Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences Sao Paulo Brazil

Abstract

AbstractPurposePatients with primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG) are required to take long‐term treatments with topical medications to halt disease progression. This cross‐sectional survey aimed to describe the level of acceptance of Brazilian patients toward the long‐term treatment with eyedrops and to find possible correlates of high acceptance.MethodsPOAG patients were recruited from the Glaucoma Service—Santa Casa of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clinical and demographic data were retrieved from participants' electronic records. All patients answered the ACCEPT© questionnaire. This is a generic patient‐reported outcome questionnaire specifically developed to assess patients' acceptance of long‐term medications and not adherence. Summed scores and those for each domain were calculated to range from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating greater acceptance.ResultsThe sample comprised 96 patients with POAG. The mean age was 63.2 ± 8.9 years; 48 were male and 48 female; 55 (57.3%) were white, 36 (37.5%) African‐Brazilian, and 5 (5.2%) were of mixed color; most patients (97.9%) had less than high school degree and all had a family income <USD10,000. The mean summed ACCEPT score was 66.2 ± 5.0. Scores for specific domains were higher for your medication (82.5 ± 35.9), side effects of your medication (86.9 ± 37.4), and effectiveness of your medication (73.3 ± 8.3). There was no association between higher scores and any sociodemographic variables.ConclusionsIn this cohort of Brazilian patients with glaucoma, acceptance of treatment was high. Patients seems to have noticed more benefits than risks to the recommended treatment regimen.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3