Postnatal genetic testing on cord blood for prenatally identified high‐probability cases

Author:

Adams Sophie1ORCID,Llorin Hannah1ORCID,Dobson Lori J.1,Studwell Courtney12ORCID,Wilkins‐Haug Louise13ORCID,Guseh Stephanie13ORCID,Gray Kathryn J.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Fetal Medicine and Reproductive Genetics Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Pathology Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Division of Maternal‐Fetal Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of postnatal genetic testing on umbilical cord blood (CB) for prenatally identified high‐probability fetuses.MethodCB for genetic testing was offered to individuals who met one of the following criteria: (i) fetal anomaly, (ii) positive non‐invasive prenatal screening by cfDNA or biochemical analysis, or (iii) family history. Individuals with diagnostic testing, but not microarray, were also included when recommended by society guidelines. CB was collected at Brigham and Women's and Emerson Hospitals between 2016 and 2021.Results448 individuals consented for cord blood testing (370 (82.6%) for fetal anomalies, 51 (11.4%) for high‐probability cfDNA, and 27 (6.0%) for family history) and a total of 393 (87.7%) samples were analyzed. Genetic testing yielded a diagnosis in 92 (23.4%) neonates by karyotype (n = 37), chromosomal microarray (CMA) (n = 32), and other molecular analysis (n = 23). Testing averaged 10.3 days (range 1–118 days). 68 (73.9%) diagnoses potentially impacted neonatal management. MCC could not be definitively excluded in only 1.4% (6/418) of samples.ConclusionPrenatal identification of high‐probability fetuses and genetic testing on CB facilitates timely genetic diagnoses and neonatal management. Testing provides reassurance and reduces a postnatal diagnostic odyssey for high‐probability neonates.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3