Intraprocedural delayed reassessment of paravalvular regurgitation in TAVR significantly reduces the use of postdilatation

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWe sought to investigate the effect of a 15‐min delayed intraprocedural reassessment of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVR) after an immediate evaluation of posttranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on the regurgitation grading and usage of postdilatation.BackgroundPVR after TAVR is associated with poor prognosis, but postdilatation may increase the risk of other complications.MethodsIn a prospective cohort of consecutive patients treated with balloon‐expandable valve ES‐3 ultra, the degree of PVR was assessed immediately and 15 min after that first evaluation (excluded severe cases), with the indication of postdilatation based on the delayed assessment. As a control group, the previous consecutive series of patients also treated with the same model of valve prosthesis was used.ResultsA total of 180 patients were included in the prospective study cohort and 152 in the retrospective control group. In the study group, the immediate PVR assessment showed none‐trace 27.5%, mild 52%, moderate 19%, and severe 1.5%, and the delayed re‐evaluation graded PVR as none‐trace 83%, mild 15.6%, and moderate 1.2% (p < 0.001 as compared to immediate). In the control group, the immediate PVR assessment showed none‐trace 33.5%, mild 52%, moderate 13%, and severe 1.5%. The rate of postdilatation was 2.8% in the study group versus 10.5% in the control group (p = 0.006). At discharge, no differences were observed between groups in PVR echocardiographic grading.ConclusionsA post‐TAVR delayed intraprocedural reassessment of the PVR shows a clearly lower degree of regurgitation as compared to immediate evaluation, which significantly decreased the indication of postdilatation.