Reporting of Complications in Rhinoplasty Randomized Controlled Trials: An Analysis Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist

Author:

Hemmerich Christian1ORCID,Corcoran Adam2,Johnson Austin L.3,Wilson Andrew1,Orris Olivia4,Arellanes Russell5,Vassar Matt16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Research Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa Oklahoma USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology Mclaren Oakland Detroit Michigan USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology The University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas USA

4. Department of Medical Research Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology Oklahoma State University Medical Center Tulsa Oklahoma USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa Oklahoma USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the completeness of adverse event (AE) reporting in randomized control trials (RCTs) focused on rhinoplasty, using the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) Extension for Harms checklist.Study DesignA cross‐sectional design was employed to review RCTs related to rhinoplasty published between January 1, 2005, and January 28, 2022.SettingThe study analyzed clinical trials on rhinoplasty retrieved from PubMed.MethodsWe performed a comprehension search on PubMed, blind and duplicate screening, and data extraction. Adherence to the 18 recommendations of the CONSORT Extension for Harms was evaluated, with 1 point assigned for each adhered item. Percent adherence was calculated based on the 18 points, taking into account the multiple subcategories within some recommendations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize adherence—including frequencies, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsOur search returned 240 articles, of which 56 met inclusion criteria. No RCTs adhered to all 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items. Twenty‐six (26/56, 46.4%) adhered to ≥50% of the items, and 30 (30/56, 53.6%) adhered to ≥33.3% of the items. Seven (7/56, 12.5%) RCTs adhered to no items. Across all RCTs, the average number of CONSORT‐Harms items adhered to was 7.2 (7.2/18, 40.0%). The most adhered to item was item 10. Discussion balanced with regard to efficacy and AEs (80.4%, [70.0‐90.8]).ConclusionThis study highlights the inadequacy of AE reporting in rhinoplasty RCTs according to CONSORT‐Harms guidelines. Urgent efforts are required to bridge this reporting gap and enhance transparency in surgical research, ultimately safeguarding patient well‐being.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference47 articles.

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2017 Plastic surgery statistics report. 2018. Accessed February 9 2022.https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2017.pdf

2. Complications in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review and Comparison with a Survey of Consent Forms

3. Rhinoplasty complications and reoperations: systematic review;Crosara P;Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2017

4. Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience and Patient Satisfaction

5. Revision Rhinoplasty: What Can We Learn from Error Patterns? An Analysis of Revision Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3