Not first‐line antihypertensive agents, but still effective—The efficacy and safety of imidazoline receptor agonists: A network meta‐analysis

Author:

Érszegi András12ORCID,Viola Réka12ORCID,Bahar Muh Akbar13ORCID,Tóth Barbara1ORCID,Fejes Imola4,Vágvölgyi Anna4ORCID,Csupor Dezső15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

2. Albert Szent‐Györgyi Medical Centre Central Pharmacy, University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

3. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar Indonesia

4. Department of Medicine, Albert Szent‐Györgyi Medical Centre University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

5. Institute for Translational Medicine University of Pécs Pécs Hungary

Abstract

AbstractCardiovascular disorders are the leading cause of death in the world. Many organ diseases (kidney, heart, and brain) are substantially more prone to develop in people with hypertension. In the treatment of hypertension, first‐line medications are recommended, while imidazoline receptor agonists are not first‐line antihypertensives. Our goal was to conduct a network meta‐analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of imidazoline receptor agonists. The meta‐analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines using the PICOS format, considering the CONSORT recommendations. Studies were collected from four databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. A total of 5960 articles were found. After filtering, 27 studies remained eligible for network meta‐analysis. Moxonidine reduced blood pressure in sitting position statistically significantly after 8 weeks of treatment (SBP MD: 23.80; 95% CI: 17.45–30.15; DBP MD: 10.90; 95% CI: 8.45–13.35) compared to placebo. Moreover, moxonidine reduced blood pressure more effectively than enalapril; however, this difference was not significant (SBP MD: 3.10; 95% CI: −2.60–8.80; DBP MD: 1.30; 95% CI: −1.25–3.85). Dry mouth was experienced as a side effect in the case of all imidazoline receptor agonists. After 8 weeks of treatment, the appearance of dry mouth was highest with clonidine (OR: 9.27 95% CI: 4.70–18.29) and lowest with rilmenidine (OR: 6.46 95% CI: 0.85–49.13) compared to placebo. Somnolence was less frequent with moxonidine compared to rilmenidine (OR: 0.63 95% CI: 0.17–2.31). Imidazoline receptor agonists were nearly as effective as the first‐line drugs in the examined studies. However, their utility as antihypertensives is limited due to their side effects. As a result, they are not first‐line antihypertensives and should not be used in monotherapy. However, in the case of resistant hypertension, they are a viable option. According to our findings, from the point of view of safety and efficacy, moxonidine appears to be the best choice among imidazoline receptor agonists.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference59 articles.

1. World Health Organization.Guideline for the Pharmacological Treatment of Hypertension in Adults.2021.

2. Diagnosis and management of resistant hypertension

3. Central Sympathetic Agents and Direct Vasodilators

4. Guanfacine as monotherapy for systemic hypertension

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3