A systematic review on performance characteristics of FNA of renal lesions: It is time for a standardized classification system

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe incidence of renal tumors has steadily increased over the past decade. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review and analysis of the literature on renal fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) to determine its performance and explore whether a standardized classification system can be used for reporting renal FNA cytology.MethodsA systematic search of published articles on renal FNA was conducted. The data on FNA and histologic diagnosis were extracted and categorized, and the risk of malignancy was calculated. Different scenarios were used to estimate FNA performance statistics.ResultsOf the 3766 potentially relevant studies, 23 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The 2231 FNA cases included were re‐categorized according to the classification system, rendering 142 (6.36%) nondiagnostic, 270 (12.1%) nonneoplastic, 271 (12.14%) benign neoplasm, 65 (2.91%) renal neoplasm with unknown malignant potential, oncocytic type, 25 (1.12%) atypia of undetermined significance, 60 (2.68%) suspicious for malignancy, and 1398 (62.66%) malignant FNA diagnoses. The risk of malignancy in these cases was 65.4%, 18.1%, 16.6%, 16.9%, 60%, 73.3%, and 96.9%, respectively. According to the classification system, the study indicated that the accuracy of renal FNA was between 91% and 95%, the sensitivity was 90.9%–96.7%, and the specificity was 82%–92% in different scenarios.ConclusionsThere is a need for a standardized reporting in renal cytology that will improve the sensitivity and accuracy of renal cytology, reduce the rate of indeterminate diagnoses, and alter the management strategies of renal lesions. Based on the available literature, a new reporting system is proposed, including categories with an associated risk of malignancy.