From burden to relief: The economic and quality‐of‐life advantages of pseudo continent perineal colostomy in ultra‐low rectal cancer patients

Author:

Lahnaoui Oumayma12,Essangri Hajar1ORCID,El bahaoui Nezha1,Majbar Mohammed Anass12,Benkabbou Amine12,Mohsine Raouf12,Souadka Amine12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Surgical Oncology Department National Institute of Oncology, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Mohammed Vth Unverisity Rabat Morocco

2. Equipe de recherche en Oncologie Translationnelle (EROT) Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Rabat Morocco

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivePseudo Continent Perineal Colostomy (PCPC) is an alternative technique to left iliac colostomy (LIC) after abdominoperineal resection for ultra low rectal cancer (ULRC). It allows placing the stoma in the perineum to preserve patients' body image. However, concerns about its impact on quality of life and management costs have limited its adoption. We aimed to compare the early outcomes and financial burden of PCPC and LIC in ULRC patients in Morocco, a low‐middle‐income country.MethodsFrom January 2018 to December 2019, all patients who underwent abdomino‐perineal resection (APR) with LIC or PCPC were prospectively enrolled. For each patient, baseline characteristics, and in hospital and 90 days morbidity with a focus on perineal complications were reported. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the validated EORTC‐C30 and CR29 questionnaires. Financial burden to patients was reported using declarative out‐of‐pocket costs (OOPC) analysis.ResultsAmong 49 patients who underwent APR, 33 received PCPC and 16 received definitive LIC. Similar rates of early perineal complications were observed between the two groups (p = 0.49). Readmission rate at POD90 was higher in the LIC‐group due to perineal sepsis (p = 0.09). QOL analysis at 6 months revealed that patients with PCPC had a higher global health status (p = 0.006), a better physical functioning and reported fewer symptoms of flatulence and fecal incontinence (p = 0.001). Patients with a LIC reported more financial difficulties with higher median OOPC of stoma management up to €23 versus €0 per month for PCPC (p = 0.0024). PCPC was the only predictive factor of improved patient reported outcomes.ConclusionsPCPC is a cost‐effective alternative to the standard definitive colostomy without alteration of the QOL or additional perineal complications during the first 6 months following the surgery. These findings may help convince surgeons to offer this option to patients refusing definitive LIC.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oncology,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference39 articles.

1. Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

2. Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer in the Twenty-First Century: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

3. A method of performing abdomino‐perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon;Miles WE;CA Cancer J Clin,1908

4. Risk Factors of Poor Functional Results at 1-Year After Pseudocontinent Perineal Colostomy for Ultralow Rectal Adenocarcinoma

5. Autotransplantation of smooth muscle for treating incontinence of sphincters (author's transl);Schmidt E;J Chir,1981

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3