A deep learning anthropomorphic model observer for a detection task in PET

Author:

Shao Muhan1,Byrd Darrin W.2,Mitra Jhimli1,Behnia Fatemeh2,Lee Jean H.2,Iravani Amir2,Sadic Murat2,Chen Delphine L.2,Wollenweber Scott D.3,Abbey Craig K.4,Kinahan Paul E.2,Ahn Sangtae1

Affiliation:

1. GE HealthCare Technology and Innovation Center Niskayuna New York USA

2. Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

3. GE HealthCare Waukesha Wisconsin USA

4. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences University of California Santa Barbara California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLesion detection is one of the most important clinical tasks in positron emission tomography (PET) for oncology. An anthropomorphic model observer (MO) designed to replicate human observers (HOs) in a detection task is an important tool for assessing task‐based image quality. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has been the most popular anthropomorphic MO. Recently, deep learning MOs (DLMOs), mostly based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been investigated for various imaging modalities. However, there have been few studies on DLMOs for PET.PurposeThe goal of the study is to investigate whether DLMOs can predict HOs better than conventional MOs such as CHO in a two‐alternative forced‐choice (2AFC) detection task using PET images with real anatomical variability.MethodsTwo types of DLMOs were implemented: (1) CNN DLMO, and (2) CNN‐SwinT DLMO that combines CNN and Swin Transformer (SwinT) encoders. Lesion‐absent PET images were reconstructed from clinical data, and lesion‐present images were reconstructed with adding simulated lesion sinogram data. Lesion‐present and lesion‐absent PET image pairs were labeled by eight HOs consisting of four radiologists and four image scientists in a 2AFC detection task. In total, 2268 pairs of lesion‐present and lesion‐absent images were used for training, 324 pairs for validation, and 324 pairs for test. CNN DLMO, CNN‐SwinT DLMO, CHO with internal noise, and non‐prewhitening matched filter (NPWMF) were compared in the same train‐test paradigm. For comparison, six quantitative metrics including prediction accuracy, mean squared errors (MSEs) and correlation coefficients, which measure how well a MO predicts HOs, were calculated in a 9‐fold cross‐validation experiment.ResultsIn terms of the accuracy and MSE metrics, CNN DLMO and CNN‐SwinT DLMO showed better performance than CHO and NPWMF, and CNN‐SwinT DLMO showed the best performance among the MOs evaluated.ConclusionsDLMO can predict HOs more accurately than conventional MOs such as CHO in PET lesion detection. Combining SwinT and CNN encoders can improve the DLMO prediction performance compared to using CNN only.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3