Perspectives of patients, carers and mental health staff on early warning signs of relapse in psychosis: a qualitative investigation

Author:

Allan StephanieORCID,Bradstreet Simon,McLeod Hamish J.ORCID,Gleeson John,Farhall John,Lambrou Maria,Clark Andrea,Gumley Andrew I.

Abstract

BackgroundRelapse prevention strategies based on monitoring of early warning signs (EWS) are advocated for the management of psychosis. However, there has been a lack of research exploring how staff, carers and patients make sense of the utility of EWS, or how these are implemented in context.AimsTo develop a multiperspective theory of how EWS are understood and used, which is grounded in the experiences of mental health staff, carers and patients.MethodTwenty-five focus groups were held across Glasgow and Melbourne (EMPOWER Trial, ISRCTN: 99559262). Participants comprised 88 mental health staff, 21 patients and 40 carers from UK and Australia (totaln= 149). Data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory.ResultsAll participants appeared to recognise EWS and acknowledged the importance of responding to EWS to support relapse prevention. However, recognition of and acting on EWS were constructed in a context of uncertainty, which appeared linked to risk appraisals that were dependent on distinct stakeholder roles and experiences. Within current relapse management, a process of weighted decision-making (where one factor was seen as more important than others) described how stakeholders weighed up the risks and consequences of relapse alongside the risks and consequences of intervention and help-seeking.ConclusionsMental health staff, carers and patients speak about using EWS within a weighted decision-making process, which is acted out in the context of relationships that exist in current relapse management, rather than an objective response to specific signs and symptoms.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference36 articles.

1. Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care

2. Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine

3. The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory

4. Muntean WJ. Nursing Clinical Decision-Making: A Literature Review. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2012 (https://www.ncsbn.org/Clinical_Judgment_Lit_Review_Executive_Summary.pdf).

5. Understanding Pathways to Care of Individuals Entering a Specialized Early Intervention Service for First-Episode Psychosis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3