Can in-depth research interviews have a ‘therapeutic’ effect for participants?

Author:

Morecroft Charles1,Cantrill Judy1,Tully Mary P1

Affiliation:

1. Drug Usage and Pharmacy Practice Group, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective The study's objective was to explore whether there was any discernible ‘therapeutic’ effect upon participants after an in-depth research interview, which focused upon their experiences of hypertension and its management. Method A questionnaire comprising 13 questions (open and closed) was posted to patients with hypertension (n = 30), three to eight months after participating in face-to-face in-depth interviews, which explored their experiences of chronic illness and its management. Key findings The data from 25 respondents (83%) suggested that in-depth research interviews could have a therapeutic benefit for some participants. This benefit was described by some as encouraging them to take more control over their lifestyle; specifically, consideration of their diet and/or increasing the time involved in regular exercise or relaxation. For others, it was the recognition of the need for both additional information on hypertension and the available treatment options, and for healthcare professionals to talk with them and to discuss their condition and its management. Conclusions Participating in an in-depth interview can have a therapeutic effect. This effect may encompass not only changes in the interviewee's perceptions and behaviour, but also the possible development of a more meaningful appreciation and understanding of their condition.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference37 articles.

1. Your son's cured now; you may take him home;Paget;Cult Med Psychiatry,1982

2. Interviewing the ill and the healthy: Paradigm or process?;Mathieson,1999

3. Feminism and models of qualitative research;Olesen,1994

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3