Affiliation:
1. Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
2. GAZI UNIVERSITY
3. Gaziantep University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
4. SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to compare trunk control, manual dexterity,
and reaction time according to different balance
states in people with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD).
Material and Method
A total of 25 PwPD, 6 of whom were women, were
included in the study. Individuals were divided into the
Moderate-risk group (n=11) and the Low-risk group
(n=14) according to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
cut-off scores. To evaluate trunk control and functions,
static and dynamic sitting balance were evaluated
with the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), which
consists of trunk coordination sub-parameters. Hand
grip strength was measured with the Jamar hand dynamometer,
manual dexterity was measured bilaterally
with the Purdue Pegboard Test, and hand reaction
time was measured bilaterally with the the Ruler Drop
Test.
Results
When the groups were compared for trunk control,
there was a significant difference in the dynamic sitting
subparameter and the total score of the trunk impairment
scale in favor of the low-risk group (p=0.030,
p=0.005). However, there was no difference between
the groups in static sitting and coordination sub-parameters
(p=0.181, p=0.558). There was no difference
between the groups in the grip strength, dexterity, and
reaction time of both hands (p>0.05).
Conclusion
While the dynamic sitting balance and trunk impairment
of the moderate-risk balance group was worse
than the low-risk group, manual dexterity and reaction
time were similar. Further studies are needed to
examine manual dexterity for trunk and distal mobility,
which play a key role in proximal stabilization and balance
in PwPD.
Publisher
Medical Journal of Suleyman Demirel University