SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL AS THE BASIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION: PROBLEMS OF MODERN DEVELOPMENT

Author:

Ivanitskaya E. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Scientific Technical Center of Industrial Safety Problems Research, CJSC

Abstract

An article in a scientific journal is the key element of modern scholarly communication system, in which scientific journals act as conductors of national science and researchers to the international level. Integration of Russian scientific journals into the global knowledge system and improving their competitiveness are necessary conditions for improving the competitiveness of Russian science itself.Today, we see a low quality of Russian scientific periodicals with an excessive number of journals. The highly competitive environment and the total use of bibliometric approaches in the research and assessment of science born unfair race for indicators, developing imitation science.The study aims to analyze, determine and propose solutions of topical issues of Russian scientific journals. The article is a case study of the oldest monthly scientific and production journal “Occupational Safety in Industry”. The transformation of the work of the editorial board is considered within the 2016–2019 period. We analyze the history of formation, development and the common problems of restructuring the activities of the editorial boards that have occurred in recent years.It is shown that the formalization of scientometric indicators and their impact on funding cause a sharp increase in the number of authors with multiple affiliations. In general, the use of bibliometrics in Russia has generated a number of systemic risks that threaten the development of national science.The study formulates the tasks and nearest prospects for the development of scientific journals as the basis for a changing scholarly communication system. It is necessary to develop the qualitative scientometrics with new scientometric indices and qualitative author-evaluating indicators (with more precise scientometrics, new tools will appear, including those for identifying dishonest scientists).To improve the evaluation system of Russian scientific journals, we propose: improving the generally accepted scientometric methods taking into account Russian specifics and introducing a system for assessing and monitoring the quality of Russian scientific journals, combining the use of bibliometric information and independent expert evaluation. The creation of high-quality scientometrics is possible with the use of artificial intelligence systems.The proposed steps will build a self-regulatory ecosystem on the Russian space of scholarly communication with well-functioning high-quality expertise, which will determine the future of scientific journals.

Publisher

NPG Publishing

Reference22 articles.

1. Ivanitskaya E. V. Article as the element of scientific communication: specifics of scientific authority formation in the international community. Science Editor and Publisher. 2018;3(1-2):44-51 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2018-1-2-44- 51

2. Kirillova O. V. How to arrange an article and scientific journal to avoid indexing errors in international scientometric databases. Science Editor and Publisher. 2018;3(1-2):52-72 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2018-1-2-52-72

3. Kabanov A. It is the reputation aspects that will determine the future of scientific journals (quality is more important than quantity). Indicator.ru. (In Russ.). Available at: https://indicator.ru/humanitarian-science/budushee-nauchnyh-zhurnalov.htm (accessed 15 November 2019).

4. Nazarenko A. Ya. Data base Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). Expectation, reality, perspectives: an inside look. Conference “Science Online XXII: electronic information resources for science and education”. 2019. (In Russ.).

5. Kirillova O. V. Publication language and the journal scientometric indicators in global citation databases. Science Editor and Publisher. 2019;4(1-2):21- 33 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267- 2019-1-2-21-33

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3