Are learning style preferences of health science students predictive of their attitudes towards e-learning?

Author:

Brown Ted,Zoghi Maryam,Williams Brett,Jaberzadeh Shapour,Roller Louis,Palermo Claire,McKenna Lisa,Wright Caroline,Baird Marilyn,Schneider-Kolsky Michal,Hewitt Lesley,Sim Jenny,Holt Tangerine-Ann

Abstract

<span>The objective for this study was to determine whether learning style preferences of health science students could predict their attitudes to e-learning. A survey comprising the </span><em>Index of Learning Styles</em><span> (ILS) and the </span><em>Online Learning Environment Survey</em><span> (OLES) was distributed to 2885 students enrolled in 10 different health science programs at an Australian university. A total of 822 useable surveys were returned generating a response rate of 29.3%. Using </span><em>SPSS</em><span>, a linear regression analysis was completed. On the ILS Active-Reflective dimension, 44% of health science students reported a preference as being active learners, 60% as sensing learners, and 64% as sequential learners. Students' attitudes toward e-learning using the OLES showed that their </span><em>preferred</em><span> scores for all 9 subscales were higher than their </span><em>actual</em><span> scores. The linear regression analysis results indicated that ILS learning styles accounted for a small percentage of the OLES </span><em>actual</em><span> and </span><em>preferred</em><span> subscales' variance. For the OLES </span><em>actual</em><span> subscales, the ILS Active-Reflective and Sensing-Intuitive learning style dimensions were the most frequent predictors of health science students' attitudes towards e-learning. For the OLES </span><em>preferred</em><span> subscales, ILS Active-Reflective and Sequential-Global learning style dimensions accounted for the most frequent source of variance. It appears that the learning styles of health science students (as measured by the ILS) can be used only to a limited extent as a predictor of students' attitudes towards e-learning. Nevertheless, educators should still consider student learning styles in the context of using technology for instructional purposes.</span>

Publisher

Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Subject

Education

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3