Affiliation:
1. Rostov State University of Economics (RSUE)
Abstract
Subject. The article considers cyclical changes of economic policy by U.S. presidents, based on either the neoclassicism concept or the postulates of neomercantilism. This struggle has become especially acute and dramatic for the economies of the rest of the world since 2016, after the election of D. Trump as President of the United States.
Objectives. The aim is to evaluate the impact of the economic policy pursued by U.S. presidents according to the methods of various economic schools, on the dynamics of GDP.
Methods. The study rests on classification of methods for the American economy over the past hundred years and their comparison with statistical data on U.S. GDP growth rates for this period, calculation of correlation coefficient between these economic indicators.
Results. The correlation coefficient between the economic policy pursued by U.S. presidents and the GDP growth rate was equal to 0.87. This is indicative of significant influence of economic policy on the U.S. GDP dynamics. The highest rates of economic growth were observed, when the U.S. economy was managed according to mercantilist principles.
Conclusions. The probability of a new return to the mercantilist methods of managing the U.S. economy and final rejection of globalization policy is quite high. The theoretical understanding of this process will help make adequate decisions in the practice of interstate relations, taking into account the uneven economic growth rates of developed liberal and developing mercantilist countries.
Publisher
Publishing House Finance and Credit
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference21 articles.
1. Jacobs M., Laybourn-Langton L. Paradigm Shifts in Economic Theory and Policy. Intereconomics, 2018, vol. 53, iss. 3, pp. 113–118. URL: Link
2. Keynes J.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money]. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2014, 405 p.
3. Ivanchenko I.S. [Optimization of Russia’s international reserves structure: Theoretical approaches, practical implementation]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2017, no. 1, pp. 64–80. (In Russ.) URL: Link
4. McDermott J. Mercantilism and Modern Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1999, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 55–80. URL: Link
5. Dequech D. Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2015, vol. 30, iss. 2, pp. 279–302. URL: Link