Perspectives of Mothers and Providers regarding Virtual Care Approaches during Pregnancy in High and Low-Income Countries: A Meta-Synthesis on Qualitative Studies

Author:

Sabetrohani Hamideh1ORCID,Koohpayehzadeh Jalil2ORCID,Sheikhtaheri Abbas3ORCID,Goli Shahrbanoo4ORCID,Keramat Afsaneh5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

2. Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Community and Family Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3. Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

5. Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Abstract

Background. Various conflicting views have been presented between beneficiaries from different countries regarding the usage of virtual prenatal care. This review aimed to explain the perspectives of mothers and providers in high- and low-income countries regarding virtual approaches during pregnancy. Methods. This synthesis was conducted with an aggregative technique (which adopts a pragmatist epistemological framework) by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, SID, Irandoc, Magiran databases, and Google Scholar search engine from January 2005 to February 2021 and completed until December 2022. Qualitative and mixed-method studies in English were included in this review. Extracted codes were set in three areas: participants, type of views (+ or −), and countries’ income levels. We used the JBI checklist for critical appraisal of the included studies. Results. Altogether, 1201 studies were retrieved, and finally, 16 articles were included in this review. We focused on the similarities of the extracted codes based on the stakeholders’ perspectives. These codes were organized into seven categories: positive or negative belief/sense, socio-cultural issues, economic save or cost, communication and information, technical issues, access and utilization, and management issues. At both income levels countries, the availability of services, lack of trust in virtual methods, cost of services or smartphones, and challenging interactions were shared codes between mothers. Also, raising engagements and extending workloads were shared items between providers. Overall, language barriers, saving time, and Internet disconnection or poor connectivity were three shared codes between the beneficiaries at two levels of countries regarding virtual care during pregnancy. Conclusion. Paying attention to virtual methods in maternal care is inevitable. Evidence illustrated that mothers and healthcare providers had different positive or negative views on this issue. The stakeholders’ perspectives should be considered in policies related to removing barriers and strengthening the benefits of virtual care during pregnancy.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3