The Professionalism in Collaboration between Health and Social Care Workers: A Survey to Members of the Finnish Trade Unions

Author:

Pakkanen PiikuORCID,Häggman-Laitila ArjaORCID,Pasanen MikoORCID,Kangasniemi MariORCID

Abstract

Background. Professionalism in collaboration means working based on competencies and ethics, showing accountability and respect in communication and care by each professional group. It is required to ensure seamless, integrated, and quality of care for patients. Previous research has focused on professionalism among single professional groups; little is known about how ethics of professionalism appear in collaboration between different professional groups. Our aim was to fill the gap in this knowledge. The objectives of the study were how health and social care workers evaluated professionalism in collaboration, how professionalism was associated with the various professional groups, and how it was related to the personal characteristics of the workers. Methods. A cross‐sectional study with an online survey was conducted in collaboration with 15 professional trade unions in Finland. The 26‐item Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment questionnaire was used. The R program, version 4.0.2, was used for advanced descriptive and statistical methods. Results. Together, 1,769 trade union members participated in the study, representing eight professional groups and students from care, rehabilitation, and social services. The mean professionalism score was 4.20 ± 0.70 out of 5, suggesting excellent professionalism in collaboration. Care assistants, childcare and youth workers, and nurses scored professionalism statistically significantly higher than social workers (p < 0.001). Participants who experienced mutual ethical reflections at work (p < 0.001), received organizational support for ethical practice (p < 0.01), and experienced satisfaction at work (p < 0.001) scored professionalism statistically significantly higher. Conclusions. Professionalism in collaboration between health and social workers was very consistent and strong, despite the fact that different professional groups participated in the survey. Organizations should further work satisfaction and opportunities to participate in shared ethical reflection. Future studies should investigate organizational structures and leadership that support this kind of well‐executed professionalism in collaboration between professional groups and if workers recognize these.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference63 articles.

1. World Health Organization Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Health professions network nursing and midwifery office within the department of human resources for health 2010 http://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/en/.

2. Defining and measuring construct of interprofessional professionalism;Hammer D.;Journal Of Allied Health,2012

3. Interprofessional professionalism: Linking professionalism and interprofessional care

4. The intersection of professionalism and interprofessional care: development and initial testing of the interprofessional professionalism assessment (IPA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3