A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection

Author:

Pontone Stefano1,Leonetti Giovanni1,Lamazza Antonietta2,Fiocca Fausto3,Filippini Angelo1,Fanello Gianfranco3,Cereatti Fabrizio3,Fiori Enrico2,Angelini Rita1,Patrizi Gregorio1,Brighi Manuela1,Vetere Simone1,Antoniozzi Angelo2,Pironi Daniele1,Manfredelli Simone4,Pontone Paolo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy

2. Department Pietro Valdoni, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy

3. Department of Surgical Sciences and Organ Transplantation—P. Stefanini, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy

4. Department of Surgery E Durante, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy

Abstract

Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value=0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value=ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3