A Comparison of Finite Difference and Finite Volume Methods with Numerical Simulations: Burgers Equation Model

Author:

Ali Ali Hasan12ORCID,Jaber Ahmed Shawki3,Yaseen Mustafa T.4,Rasheed Mohammed5,Bazighifan Omer67ORCID,Nofal Taher A.8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq

2. Doctoral School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Debrecen, H-4002 Debrecen, Pf 400, Hungary

3. Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH 45435, USA

4. Department of Business Administration, Shatt Al-Arab University College, Basrah, Iraq

5. Applied Sciences Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq

6. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hadhramout University, Hadhramout 50512, Yemen

7. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Seiyun University, Hadhramout 50512, Yemen

8. Department of Mathematic, College of Science, Taif University, P.O Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

In this paper, we present an intensive investigation of the finite volume method (FVM) compared to the finite difference methods (FDMs). In order to show the main difference in the way of approaching the solution, we take the Burgers equation and the Buckley–Leverett equation as examples to simulate the previously mentioned methods. On the one hand, we simulate the results of the finite difference methods using the schemes of Lax–Friedrichs and Lax–Wendroff. On the other hand, we apply Godunov’s scheme to simulate the results of the finite volume method. Moreover, we show how starting with a variational formulation of the problem, the finite element technique provides piecewise formulations of functions defined by a collection of grid data points, while the finite difference technique begins with a differential formulation of the problem and continues to discretize the derivatives. Finally, some graphical and numerical comparisons are provided to illustrate and corroborate the differences between these two main methods.

Funder

Taif University

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Multidisciplinary,General Computer Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3