Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting

Author:

da Silva Wellington José1ORCID,Silva José Rodrigo Santos2ORCID,de Souza Siqueira Quintans Jullyana3ORCID,de Lucca Junior Waldecy1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience of Sergipe (LaNMSE), Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, S/N, Rosa Elze, 49000-100 São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil

2. Department of Statistic, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, S/N, Rosa Elze, 49000-100 São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil

3. Laboratory Neurosciences and Pharmacological Tests, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, S/N, Rosa Elze, 49000-100 São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil

Abstract

There is not a described method to count the core label of c-Fos-positive neurons, avoiding false-positive and false-negative results. The aim of this manuscript is to provide guidelines for a secure and accurate method to calculate a threshold to select which core of c-Fos-positive neurons marked by immunofluorescence has to be scored. A background percentage was calculated by dividing the intensity value (0 to 255) of the core of c-Fos-positive neurons by its surrounding background from the 8-bit images obtained in a previous study. Using the background percentage from 20% up to 98%, raising 2% once for each score, as threshold to choose which core has to be counted, a script was written for the R program to count the number of the c-Fos-positive neurons and the comparison between control and experimental groups. The differences of the average number of the core counted c-Fos-positive neurons between control and experimental groups, at all thresholds studied, showed a rising value related to an increase of the background percentage threshold as well as a decrease of its p value related to an increase of the threshold of background percentage. For the smallest thresholds (high intensity of label), the differences between groups are suppressed (false negative). However, for the biggest thresholds (nonspecific label), these differences are always the same (false positive). Therefore, to avoid the false-negative and the false-positive values, it was chosen as the threshold of 62% the inflection point of the linear regression, which is equally different from the biggest and smallest values of the differences between groups.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3