Basal Cell Carcinoma Pathology Requests and Reports Are Lacking Important Information

Author:

Al-Qarqaz Firas1ORCID,Bodoor Khaldon2,Al-Tarawneh Awad3,Eloqayli Haytham4ORCID,Al Gargaz Wisam5,Alshiyab Diala1,Muhaidat Jihan1,Alqudah Mohammad6,Almomani Rowida7,Marji Maha1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan

2. Department of Applied Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

3. Department of Internal Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Mu’tah, Jordan

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

5. Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

6. Department of Pathology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

7. Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

Abstract

Introduction.Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer affecting humans. Luckily it has negligible risk for metastasis; however it can be locally destructive to surrounding tissue. The diagnosis of this tumor relies on clinical and dermoscopic features; however confirmation requires biopsy and histologic examination. Based on clinical and pathologic findings, BCC is classified as low or high risk subtype. The clinician requesting pathology examination for BCC should provide the pathologist with detailed information including patient details, relevant clinical and medical history, site and type of the biopsy, and whether this is a primary or recurrent lesion. The pathologist on the other hand should write an adequate report containing a minimum of core set of parameters including type of BCC, depth of invasion, presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and the excision margins.Objectives.The objective of this study is to evaluate whether requests by clinicians and pathology reports of BCC are adequate.Methods.This is a retrospective analysis done at the dermatology department, faculty of medicine at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. Reports for the period from January 2003 to December 2017 were retrieved and analyzed for data completeness.Results.Most clinical request forms of BCC provided by clinicians are inadequate and lack important relevant information especially in regard to lesion history, patient medical history, and whether BCC is a primary or a recurrent one. Pathology reports for BCC cases also have significant deficiency especially in describing the histologic subtype, depth of invasion, and presence of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. However, the tumor excision margins are adequately described in almost all reports.Conclusions.The study shows that clinicians do not provide adequate clinical information when submitting a request for histopathologic examination of BCC. Similarly, pathologists write incomplete reports that lack important pathologic features. Having pre-set forms (electronic proforma) can help overcome missing information.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Dermatology,Oncology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3