Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up

Author:

Gouvinhas Cláudia1ORCID,Veiga Dalila2,Mendonça Liliane3,Sampaio Rute14,Azevedo Luís Filipe356,Castro-Lopes José Manuel134

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

2. Chronic Pain Center-Anesthesiology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal

3. National Observatory for Pain (NOPain), Porto, Portugal

4. Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology (IBMC), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

5. Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

6. Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Background. Interventional Pain Management (IPM) is performed in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics (MCPC), including a range of invasive techniques to diagnose and treat chronic pain (CP) conditions. Current patterns of use of those techniques in MCPC have not yet been reported. Objective. We aimed to describe quantitatively and qualitatively the use of IPM and other therapeutic procedures performed on-site at four Portuguese MCPC. Methods. A prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up was performed in adult patients. A structured case report form was systematically completed at baseline and six and 12 months. Results. Among 808 patients referred to the MCPC, 17.2% had been prescribed IPM. Patients with IPM were on average younger and had longer CP duration and lower levels of maximum pain and pain interference/disability. The three main diagnoses were low back pain (n=28), postoperative CP, and knee pain (n=16 each). From 195 IPM prescribed, nerve blocks (n=108), radiofrequency (n=31), and viscosupplementation (n=22) were the most prevalent. Some IPM techniques were only available in few MCPC. One MCPC did not provide IPM. Conclusions. IPM are seldom prescribed in Portuguese MCPC. Further studies on IPM safety and effectiveness are necessary for clear understanding the role of these techniques in CP management.

Funder

University of Porto

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3