Perceptions of Patient Safety Competence among Undergraduate Nursing and Nursing Associate Students: A Comparative Cross‐Sectional Study

Author:

De Rezende HelenaORCID,Ooms AnnORCID,Kaya Guldane DamlaORCID,Wang ChaoORCID

Abstract

Background. Nursing professionals are pivotal in coordinating care and incorporating quality and safety strategies to enhance patient outcomes. Therefore, nursing education is paramount in preparing nurses to deliver safe care. Aim. In this study, we aimed to explore the self‐reported patient safety competence acquired by undergraduate nursing students in classroom and clinical settings and to compare their perceptions of how broader patient safety issues are addressed in their programmes. Methods. We conducted a cross‐sectional study in a public university in London, United Kingdom, and included Bachelor of Science nursing students from all fields of nursing and Nursing Associate students (n = 250, response rate 21.3%). Students completed the Health Professional Education Patient Safety Survey (H‐PEPSS). Paired t‐tests examined the differences in learning (classroom versus clinical setting). Analysis of variance was used to explore differences in self‐reported patient safety competencies across programmes and to compare students’ perceptions of how broader patient safety issues are addressed in their curricula. Results. Mean domain scores indicate high confidence levels in patient safety competence for learning gained in both classroom and clinical settings for all students (>4.0/5.0). Results also indicate a consensus among students from various programmes that broader patient safety issues are adequately addressed in the curricula. Self‐reported confidence was highest in respondents enrolled in the Nursing Associate programme and students with prior experience in a clinical setting. Students were confident about their learnings of patient safety in their educational programmes. Conclusions. Greater patient safety competence indicates comprehension and familiarity with knowledge boundaries, which in turn acknowledges the limitations of autonomous practice. Our findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions to enhance specific areas of patient safety competence and emphasise the shared responsibility of educators in fostering a culture of safety within healthcare.

Funder

Kingston University

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3