Structural Integration as an Adjunct to Outpatient Rehabilitation for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial

Author:

Jacobson Eric E.1,Meleger Alec L.23,Bonato Paolo245,Wayne Peter M.6,Langevin Helene M.67,Kaptchuk Ted J.8,Davis Roger B.8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

2. Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 300 First Avenue, Charleston, MA 02129, USA

3. Spine Center, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 159 Wells Avenue, Newton, MA 02459, USA

4. Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 300 First Avenue, Charleston, MA 02129, USA

5. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 45 Carleton Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

6. Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA

7. Department of Neurological Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401, USA

8. Division of General Medicine & Primary Care, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Abstract

Structural Integration (SI) is an alternative method of manipulation and movement education. To obtain preliminary data on feasibility, effectiveness, and adverse events (AE), 46 outpatients from Boston area with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) were randomized to parallel treatment groups of SI plus outpatient rehabilitation (OR)versusOR alone. Feasibility data were acceptable except for low compliance with OR and lengthy recruitment time. Intent-to-treat data on effectiveness were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum,n=23per group. Median reductions in VAS Pain, the primary outcome, of-26 mm in SI + ORversus0 in OR alone were not significantly different(P=0.075). Median reductions in RMDQ, the secondary outcome, of-2 points in SI + ORversus0 in OR alone were significantly different(P=0.007). Neither the proportions of participants with nor the seriousness of AE were significantly different. SI as an adjunct to OR for CNSLBP is not likely to provide additional reductions in pain but is likely to augment short term improvements in disability with a low additional burden of AE. A more definitive trial is feasible, but OR compliance and recruitment might be challenging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01322399).

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3