Effect Comparison of Assisted Surgery Simulated by Preoperative 3D Reconstruction and Minimally Invasive Surgery with the Assist of Knee Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fracture under the Background of Intelligent Medicine

Abstract

Objective. To explore the effect comparison of the assisted surgery simulated by preoperative 3D reconstruction and the minimally invasive surgery with the assist of knee arthroscopy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture (TPF) under the background of intelligent medicine. Methods. 100 patients with TPF admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected as the study subjects. According to the order of admission, the patients were divided into the simulation group with 3D reconstruction (n = 50) and the auxiliary group with knee arthroscopy (n = 50), and the clinical indicators were compared between the two groups. Results. There was no significant difference in any other clinical treatment indexes between the two groups except the surgery time ( $P>0.05$ ), and there was no significant difference in knee flexion ability, walking ability, and Rasmussen scores between the two groups after treatment ( $P>0.05$ ). However, compared with the auxiliary group with knee arthroscopy, the mean posterior slope angle and varus angle of the patients were significantly higher ( $P<0.001$ ), and the total incidence of complications was significantly lower ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Based on the analysis under the background of intelligent medicine, it is found that the assisted surgery simulated by preoperative 3D reconstruction has a better effect and a higher safety, but they have the similar effects on improving the knee joint function of patients.