Challenging the obesity paradox: extreme obesity and COPD mortality in the SUMMIT trial

Author:

Brigham Emily P.ORCID,Anderson Julie A.ORCID,Brook Robert D.,Calverley Peter M.A.,Celli Bartolome R.ORCID,Cowans Nicholas J.,Crim Courtney,Diserens James E.,Martinez Fernando J.,McCormack Meredith C.,Newby David E.,Yates Julie,Vestbo JorgenORCID,Wu Tianshi DavidORCID,Wise Robert A.ORCID

Abstract

Populations with COPD demonstrate higher survival in overweight and obese compared with normal weight; the “obesity paradox”. Relationships in less-severe COPD are unclear, as is the impact of cardiovascular risk, and few studies include individuals at extremes of obesity. We examined the relationship between body mass index (BMI; defined as underweight: <20 kg·m−2, normal: 20–25 kg·m−2, overweight: 25– <30 kg·m−2, obese class I: 30– <35 kg·m−2, class II: 35– <40 kg·m−2 and class III: ≥40 kg·m−2), morbidity, and mortality in the SUMMIT trial population (n=16 485), characterised by moderate COPD and heightened cardiovascular risk with a substantial proportion with class III obesity. The association between BMI category and time to event was modelled via proportional hazards (reference normal weight) adjusted for demographics and cardiorespiratory disease. Consistent with the paradox, underweight individuals demonstrated higher mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.31 (95% CI 1.04–1.64)), with lower mortality among overweight (HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.52–0.73)) and obese class I (HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.90)). However, mortality increased in obese class III (HR 1.36 (95% CI 1.00–1.86)). Death was primarily attributable to cardiovascular causes. Within a large, multinational cohort with moderate COPD and increased cardiovascular risk, the phenomenon of reduced mortality with obesity did not persist at BMI >40 kg·m−2, suggesting that obesity may not remain protective at the extremes in this population.

Funder

GlaxoSmithKline

Publisher

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3