Effective Use of Modern Technologies in Learning in the Educational Process as one of the Factors Affecting Quality (Case-Based Technology)

Author:

Guliyev A.,Aslanova G.

Abstract

The research led to the following conclusion. An attempt to use case technology in pedagogic lessons consistently, and even more precisely, in each lesson may turn out to be useless. Firstly, preparation of quality cases for each lesson requires a lot of effort and time. Low-quality notes prepared by a teacher who cannot achieve this in a short time will do more harm than good. Secondly, it is unacceptable to keep students in constant tension during classes. Thirdly, this technology is aimed at researching and solving individual problems (situations). This is ineffective from the point of view of formation of system knowledge and skills on the subject. Finally, the lesson is successful if you purposefully apply different technologies in interaction. Like all other learning technologies, the application of the case method is in the center of attention. Like all other learning technologies, the strengths and weaknesses of the case method are based on conducting special research on the basis of an experiment, creating a new one. a scientific opinion, a different position, a grounded theoretical generalization about this technology, interesting and can lead to the development of useful training models.

Publisher

Publishing Center Science and Practice

Reference7 articles.

1. Grigor'ev, O. V., & Litvinenko, N. M. (2011). Sovremennye tekhnologii obucheniya. Innovatsii v obrazovanii, (7), 17-24. (in Russian).

2. Gaimnazarov, O., Agafonov, A., & Saidov, Zh. (2023). Sovremennaya tekhnologiya problemnogo obucheniya. Evraziiskii zhurnal tekhnologii i innovatsii, 1(6), 94-99. (in Russian).

3. Bridgman, T., Cummings, S., & McLaughlin, C. (2016). Restating the case: How revisiting the development of the case method can help us think differently about the future of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(4), 724-741. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0291

4. Dewey, J. (2024). Democracy and education. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dewe21010-003

5. Giroux, H. A. (2003). Public spaces, private lives: Democracy beyond 9/11. Rowman & Littlefield.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3