Affiliation:
1. Research Laboratory «FSEMC» TUSUR
2. Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics
Abstract
The paper presents a comparison of excitation source models when modeling antennas by the method of moments. By using a set of adjacent edges when specifying the impact, it is possible to obtain correct results when the computational grid of the antenna model is more frequent. This is shown on the example of a symmetric electric vibrator.
Publisher
Bryansk State Technical University
Reference7 articles.
1. Makarov S. N. Antenna and EM modeling with MATLAB. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002. 288 p., Makarov S. N. Antenna and EM modeling with MATLAB. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002. 288 p.
2. Rao S., Wilton D., Glisson A. Electromagnetic scattering by surfaces of arbitrary shape // IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation. 1982. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 409–418., Rao S., Wilton D., Glisson A. Electromagnetic scattering by surfaces of arbitrary shape // IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation. 1982. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 409–418.
3. Gibson W.C. The method of moments in electromagnetic. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2008. 272 p., Gibson W.C. The method of moments in electromagnetic. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2008. 272 p.
4. An enhanced gap source model / W. Ding, et al. // IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation. 2013. Vol. 61. No. 3. P. 1266–1272., An enhanced gap source model / W. Ding, et al. // IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation. 2013. Vol. 61. No. 3. P. 1266–1272.
5. Du P., Fu W.J. Comparison of two feed models considering gap width for antennas // Proceedings of IEEE Asia-Pacific conference on antennas and propagation (APCAP). 2018. P. 23–24., Du P., Fu W.J. Comparison of two feed models considering gap width for antennas // Proceedings of IEEE Asia-Pacific conference on antennas and propagation (APCAP). 2018. P. 23–24.