Author:
Setyawan Haris,Denny Hanifa M.,Nurjazuli Nurjazuli,Dewi Endah Kumala
Abstract
Background:
In 2017, the prevalence of work-related stress reached 10.7% of the 792 million population. This work-related stress is common in the textile industry, characterized by many environmental risk factors coming from the weaving processes. The stress problem is discussed in various countries worldwide.
Objective:
The study aimed to investigate the personal and environmental risk factors for work-related stress in textile industry workers.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study was conducted in a textile factory weaving section in Solo, Indonesia. The subjects of this study were 188 female weaving operators that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sound level meter was operated to measure the environmental noise, while environmental working conditions, work experience, social support, and work-related stress were measured using questionnaires. Furthermore, the Somers' Delta correlation was used to analyze the relationship between personal and environmental risk factors for work-related stress.
Results:
Surprisingly, this study found no significant correlation between personal and environmental risk factors (independent variables) with work-related stress (dependent variables). In personal factors, most of the workers are late adulthood (36-45 years old), the length of working dominated more than ten years (90.42%), with most of them having senior high school education (58.51%). In terms of environmental risk factors, most of the workers have good working environment conditions (51.6%); are well experienced in weaving tasks (54.3%), with a high social support category (58%).
Conclusion:
Although some previous studies indicated that personal factors, working conditions, and social support could trigger stress among workers, this study found no correlation between the independent and the dependent variables.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care,Health (social science)
Reference45 articles.
1. Purwanto A, Fahlevi M, Zuniawan A, Kusuma RDP, Supriatna H, Maryani E.
The COVID-19 pandemic impact on industries performance: An explorative study of Indonesian companies.
J Crit Rev
2020;
7
(15)
: 1965-72.
2. Alkahtani M, Omair M, Khalid QS, Hussain G, Ahmad I, Pruncu C.
COVID-19supply chain management strategy based on variable production under uncertain environmental conditions.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
2021;
18
(4)
: 1662.
3. Sumardiyono S.
The difference blood cortisol level between male and female on workers exposed by continuous noise.
J Vocat Health Studies
2020;
3
(3)
: 120-5.
4. Clark C, Crumpler C, Notley H.
Evidence for environmental noise effects on health for the United Kingdom policy context: A systematic review of the effects of environmental noise on mental health, wellbeing, quality of life, cancer, dementia, birth, reproductive outcomes, and cognition.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
2020;
17
(2)
: 393.
5. Guski R, Schreckenberg D, Schuemer R.
WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: A systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
2017;
14
(12)
: 1539.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献