Author:
Baroudi Kusai,Mahmoud Said
Abstract
The aim of this work was to present the different current methods of decreasing viscosity of resin composite materials such as (using flowable composites, lowering the viscosity of the monomer mixture, heating composites and applying sonic vibration) and furnish dentists with a basis that can provide criteria for choosing one or another to suit their therapeutic requirements. The four discussed methods proved that lowering composite viscosity improves its handling and facilitates its application to cavities with complicated forms, decreasing time for procedure and improving marginal adaptation. Other properties improved by decreasing composite resin viscosity were controversial between the four methods and affected by other factors such as composite brand and light cure unit.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference59 articles.
1. Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. Low-shrinkage composite for dental application Dent Mater J 2007; 26 (2) : 149-55.
2. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives J Dent 1998; 26 (1) : 1-20.
3. Browne RM, Tobias RS. Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: a review Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2 (5) : 177-83.
4. Clelland NL, Pagnotto MP, Kerby RE, Seghi RR. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93 (2) : 153-7.
5. Yazici AR, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities Oper Dent 2003; 28 (6) : 773-8.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献