Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Author:

Bhogal Sukhdeep1,Mukherjee Debabrata2,Bagai Jayant3,Truong Huu T.4,Panchal Hemang B.5,Murtaza Ghulam1,Zaman Mustafa6,Sachdeva Rajesh7,Paul Timir K.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States

2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University, TX 79409, United States

3. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States

4. University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States

5. Columbia University at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL 10027, United States

6. BSM Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

7. Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, United States

Abstract

Introduction: Bivalirudin and heparin are the two most commonly used anticoagulants used during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). The results of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in the era of radial access are controversial, questioning the positive impact of bivalirudin on bleeding. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the results of RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin with or without Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (GPI). Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA statements for reporting systematic reviews. We searched the National Library of Medicine PubMed, Clinicaltrial.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to include clinical studies comparing bivalirudin with heparin in patients undergoing PCI. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed for the summary. Findings: Several RCTs and meta-analyses have demonstrated the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin plus routine GPI use in terms of preventing bleeding complications but at the expense of increased risk of ischemic complications such as stent thrombosis. The hypothesis of post- PCI bivalirudin infusion to mitigate the risk of acute stent thrombosis has been tested in various RCTs with conflicting results. In comparison, heparin offers the advantage of having a reversible agent, of lower cost and reduced incidence of ischemic complications. Conclusion: Bivalirudin demonstrates its superiority over heparin plus GPI with better clinical outcomes in terms of less bleeding complications, thus making it as anticoagulation of choice particularly in patients at high risk of bleeding. Further studies are warranted for head to head comparison of bivalirudin to heparin monotherapy to establish an optimal heparin dosing regimen and post-PCI bivalirudin infusion to affirm its beneficial effect in reducing acute stent thrombosis.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pharmacology,Hematology,Molecular Medicine,General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Subherwal S.; Peterson E.D.; Dai D.; Thomas L.; Messenger J.C.; Xian Y.; Brindis R.G.; Feldman D.N.; Senter S.; Klein L.W.; Marso S.P.; Roe M.T.; Rao S.V.; Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012,59(21),1861-1869

2. Valgimigli M.; Frigoli E.; Leonardi S.; Rothenbühler M.; Gagnor A.; Calabrò P.; Garducci S.; Rubartelli P.; Briguori C.; Andò G.; Repetto A.; Limbruno U.; Garbo R.; Sganzerla P.; Russo F.; Lupi A.; Cortese B.; Ausiello A.; Ierna S.; Esposito G.; Presbitero P.; Santarelli A.; Sardella G.; Varbella F.; Tresoldi S.; de Cesare N.; Rigattieri S.; Zingarelli A.; Tosi P.; van ’t Hof A.; Boccuzzi G.; Omerovic E.; Sabaté M.; Heg D.; Jüni P.; Vranckx P.; Bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2015,373(11),997-1009

3. O’Gara P.T.; Kushner F.G.; Ascheim D.D.; Casey D.E.; Chung M.K.; de Lemos J.A.; Ettinger S.M.; Fang J.C.; Fesmire F.M.; Franklin B.A.; Granger C.B.; Krumholz H.M.; Linderbaum J.A.; Morrow D.A.; Newby L.K.; Ornato J.P.; Ou N.; Radford M.J.; Tamis-Holland J.E.; Tommaso C.L.; Tracy C.M.; Woo Y.J.; Zhao D.X.; 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013,61(4),e78-e140

4. Ndrepepa G.; Berger P.B.; Mehilli J.; Seyfarth M.; Neumann F.J.; Schömig A.; Kastrati A.; Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: Appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008,51(7),690-697

5. Stone G.W.; McLaurin B.T.; Cox D.A.; Bertrand M.E.; Lincoff A.M.; Moses J.W.; White H.D.; Pocock S.J.; Ware J.H.; Feit F.; Colombo A.; Aylward P.E.; Cequier A.R.; Darius H.; Desmet W.; Ebrahimi R.; Hamon M.; Rasmussen L.H.; Rupprecht H.J.; Hoekstra J.; Mehran R.; Ohman E.M.; Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006,355(21),2203-2216

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3