Comparison Between the Effects of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia on QT Dispersion

Author:

Pehlivan Veli F.1ORCID,Akçay Murat2,İkeda Özlem C.2,Göğüş Nermin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Medical Faculty of Harran University, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Background: Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine are frequently used local anesthetic drugs in spinal anesthesia practice. Both agents have arrhythmic effects on the heart. However, there is no clear information about which agent is more arrhythmogenic. Objective: The aim of this article is to investigate the effects of bupivacaine and its S (-)-enantiomer, levobupivacaine, on cardiac arrhythmias in patients. Methods: The study included 40 patients scheduled for inguinal hernia surgery. Patients were randomly divided into the following two groups using a sealed envelope method: Group I, the bupivacaine group (n = 20); and Group II, the levobupivacaine group (n = 20). The QT values were taken preoperatively and during the 10th of the spinal block, the 10th of the surgical incision, and the 10th postoperative minute. Additionally, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SO2), and heart rate (HR) values, in addition to motor block (Bromage scale) levels and durations, were recorded for each patient. Results: HR values measured at 10 min after spinal block were significantly higher than the baseline values in the levobupivacaine group (p %#60; 0.05). The corrected QT interval (QTc) values increased significantly at 10 minutes after spinal block and at 10 min postoperatively in the bupivacaine group (p %#60; 0.05). QTd and QTcd measurements were taken at the 10th minute of spinal anesthesia, the 10th minute of the incision, and the 10th minute postoperatively. When compared to the levobupivacaine group, a statistically significant increase was found in the bupivacaine group (p %#60;0.05). Conclusion: Levobupivacaine allows greater hemodynamic stability, while bupivacaine affects QTc and QTd measurement times more. As such, we believe that levobupivacaine may be a better alternative to bupivacaine during clinical practice, particularly in patients with cardiac problems.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pharmacology,Hematology,Molecular Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3