A Systematic Review of Instruments Measuring the Division of Care Responsibilities between Children with Type 1 Diabetes and their Parents

Author:

Aalders Jori123ORCID,Nefs Giesje145ORCID,Hartman Esther1ORCID,A. Nguyen Linh1ORCID,Winterdijk Per5ORCID,van Mil Edgar6ORCID,Aanstoot Henk-Jan5ORCID,Pouwer Frans237ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders [CoRPS], Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

2. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

3. Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense, Denmark

4. Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

5. Diabeter, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Care and Research, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

6. Kidz&Ko, Jeroen Bosch Hospital's- Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

7. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

Abstract

Background: The division of care responsibilities between parents and children with type 1 diabetes, and an optimal transfer of responsibilities from parent to child over time are assumed to be key for optimal diabetes outcomes during childhood and adolescence. However, an overview of instruments assessing this division as well as their psychometric qualities is currently lacking. Objective: The study aims to 1) identify all existing instruments, 2) evaluate their psychometric properties, and 3) provide an overview of scoring methods. Methods: Pubmed and PsycINFO were searched using a priori-defined search string. Peerreviewed studies in English using an instrument assessing the division of diabetes care responsibilities between children (6-18 years) and parents were included. In total, 84 of 725 articles qualified, covering 62 unique samples. Results: Thirteen questionnaires were identified. The Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ) was most frequently used across studies. Instructions, content and number of tasks, response options, and scoring methods varied across questionnaires. Recent studies often adapted questionnaires, contributing to the heterogeneity across measures. Overall, reporting and quality of psychometric properties was suboptimal. Conclusion: The division of diabetes care responsibilities can be operationalized with various instruments, each having its strengths and weaknesses but all with limited psychometric support. To measure the division of diabetes care responsibilities more adequately, an updated version of the popular DFRQ or a new scale needs to be developed and evaluated.

Funder

Dutch Research Council (NWO) Research Talent

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3