Comparison of Umbilical Cord Arterial Blood Gas and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with and without Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid During Labor

Author:

Dehghan Mahshid1,Mousavi Sanaz2,Akhgari Aisan1,Hoseinzadeh Maryam2,Mirghafourvand Mojgan1,Tafreshi Rosa2,Nikniaz Leila3

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Alzahra Hospital, Tabriz, Iran

3. Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) may increase maternal and neonatal complications. The favorable mode of delivery is controversial in women with MSAF. This study aimed to compare umbilical cord arterial blood gas (ABG) and neonatal outcomes in deliveries complicated by meconium and clear amniotic fluid during the active phase of labor. Materials and Methods: This observational study was performed on 144 term pregnant women (72 with MSAF and 72 with clear amniotic fluid) during the active phase of labor with ruptured membranes admitted to Al-Zahra and Taleghani hospitals in Tabriz, Iran, from June 2019 to June 2020. A checklist was used to record the ABG and neonatal outcomes. Results: The frequency of cesarean delivery in the MSAF group (25%) was significantly higher than in the women with clear amniotic fluid (20%) (P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding pH, base excess, PCO2, 1- and 5- minute Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission of the newborn due to MSAF (P> 0.05). There was no incidence of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, sepsis, and seizure. Conclusion: Given the non-significant difference between two groups of women with and without MSAF during labor in terms of neonatal outcomes and umbilical cord ABG, it seems that MSAF alone is not an indication for cesarean delivery. Thus, vaginal delivery is recommended in pregnant women with MSAF.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3