Effectiveness of Pharmacological Pain Relief Methods on Birth Experience: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Ghanbari-Homayi Solmaz1,Hasani Sonia2ORCID,Pourfathi Hojjat3,Mirghafourvand Mojgan4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz,, Iran

2. Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz,, Iran

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz,, Iran

4. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,, Iran

Abstract

Background:: The use of pharmacological pain relief methods during labour is increasing, however there is no clear evidence that pharmacological interventions can also improve women’s satisfaction with birth experience. Objective:: To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions on women's satisfaction with birth experience (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the received method (secondary outcome). Methods:: We searched databases in English (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science) and Persian languages (SID and Magiran) from inception until April 30, 2018 for clinical trials that pharmacological pain relief methods were compared with standard or routine cares, or non-pharmacological methods. The evaluation of studies in term of risk of bias was conducted using the Cochrane Handbook. Meta-analysis results were reported as OR and 95% confidence interval. In meta-analysis, subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of intervention. Due to the heterogeneity of over 30%, random effect was reported instead of the fixed effect. The heterogeneity was evaluated using I2, T2 and Chi2. The evaluation of the quality of the studies was also examined using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE) approach. Results:: The results of 7 studies with low-quality in meta-analysis, showed that pharmacological methods significantly improved satisfaction with birth experience (OR = 2.99; 95% CI: 1.37 to 6.52; P = 0.006). However, meta-analysis of subgroups showed that only inhalation of Entonox gas (OR = 6.51; 95% CI: 3.47 to 12.22; P < 0.001), in contrast to epidural analgesia (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.27; P = 0.60) and Hyoscine injection (OR = 2.58; 95% CI: 0.93 to 7.20; P = 0.07) significantly improved satisfaction with birth experience. Conclusion:: Pharmacological interventions such as epidural, although introduced as one of the effective methods for pain relief, may not provide women with satisfaction with birth. However, more studies with precise methodology, high sample size, and standard tools should be performed to more accurately investigate the effect of pharmacological interventions on birth experience.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3