Author:
Elshahat Elsayed M.,AbdelAal Gamal M.,Hassan Samar,Eltohamy Eslam
Abstract
Aims:
Experiments were conducted to study the effect of using a perforated sill on maximum scour depth downstream from a sluice gate.
Background:
Previous studies have shown that screens may be utilized efficiently for dissipating the energy of water downstream of a hydraulic structure.
Objective:
For the present study, a series of experiments was conducted to investigate the effect of using a perforated screen sill on the maximum scour depth downstream of a hydraulic structure.
Methods: In the present study, a single perforated sill with varying porosity (10.3%, 18.3%, 28.5%, and 41.1%) and an inclination angle of 90° were used. Perforated sill with different shapes of holes (circular, rectangular, and square holes) was used during the study. The major parameters for the present study are the porosity of the perforated sill, different shapes of holes, downstream water depth, and the Gate Froude number (FG) for a range covering from 2.15 to 4.7. The gate opening simulating a hydraulic structure is adjusted at heights of 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm during the experiments work.
Result:
The results revealed that an increase in the sill porosity (Ao/As) increases the screen effect to reduce the max scour depth. In addition, the results showed that the sill with square holes is better than the sill with circular and rectangular holes in reducing the maximum scour depth.
Conclusion:
The perforated sill with a square porosity of 41.1% reduces the maximum scour depth downstream of a sluice gate by 60%.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference28 articles.
1. Ali HM, El Gendy MM, Mirdan AMH, Ali AAM, Abdelhaleem FSF.
Minimizing downstream scour due to submerged hydraulic jump using corrugated aprons.
Ain Shams Eng J
2014;
5
(4)
: 1059-69.
2. Lim S-Y, Yu G.
Scouring downstream of sluice gate
First International Conference on Scour of Foundations.
November 17-20, 2002;
College Station, USA.
2002;
395-409.
3. Rajaratnam N.
Erosion by plane turbulent jets.
J Hydraul Res
1981;
19
(4)
: 339-58.
4. Melville BW.
Scour at various hydraulic structures: Sluice gates, submerged bridges, low weirs.
5th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures.
Brisbane, Australia. 2014.
25-27 June 2014;
5. Mahmoud M, Ahmed S, Al-Fahal A.
Effect of different shapes of holes on energy dissipation through perpendicular screen.
J Environ Stud
2013;
12
(1)
: 29-37.