Computer comparison of design knowledge

Author:

Li Q1,Zhang W J2

Affiliation:

1. University of Adelaide Department of Mechanical Engineering South Australia

2. University of Saskatchewan Department of Mechanical Engineering Saskatoon, Canada

Abstract

Automatic comparison of design knowledge generated and consumed during a design process is very useful. Basically, design knowledge can be classified into four categories: (a) artefact (product) structures, (b) artefact behaviours, (c) artefact functions and (d) causalities among structures, behaviours and functions. This paper proposes an intelligent hybrid graph approach to represent design knowledge associated with these categories. Comparison of design knowledge thus turns out to be the comparison of hybrid graphs. A general algorithm is developed for the graph comparison purpose. In this general algorithm, comparison of line graphs is an important task, which is realized by using the Hopfield—Tank neural network algorithm. An initial implementation of this algorithm proves to be promising.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering

Reference41 articles.

1. Canonical numbering of kinematic chains and isomorphism problem: min code

2. Identification of kinematic chains, mechanisms, path generators and function generators using min codes

3. Dijksman E. A., Timmermans E. A. On the look-out for prime-chains with a prescribed number of mobility- degrees of freedom (type-synthesis of prime-chains). In Proceedings of the Delft-Eindhoven-Twente Seminar, The Netherlands, October 1992.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A knowledge-based system for quality analysis in model-based design;Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing;2020-01-24

2. Research on Method of Knowledge Classification for Supporting Product Creative Design;Advanced Materials Research;2010-10

3. Heuristic guidelines to support conceptual design;Research in Engineering Design;2008-09-11

4. Knowledge comparison in design repositories;Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence;2003-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3