The Epistolary Discourse “Letters to Oles Honchar”: an Addressee-Addresser Strategy

Author:

S Stepanenko N

Abstract

The range of the most topical issues of the up-to-date linguistics allows strengthening by the stylistic differentiation of the literary language. Actually, the researchers’ crucial attention is paid to the core problem of the epistolary discourse’s place within the stylistic paradigm. It is worth mentioning that in the specific structured epistolary style there is an addressee-addresser strategy, which holds a core position. The latter functions as an architectonic centre of the correspondence context. This research contains the thorough disquisition of the “Letters to Oles Honchar” epistolary, including 895 correspondences of the artistic word masters, publicists, literary experts, and specialists to Oles Honchar, the world-fame writer. In fact, the main attention was focused on the addressee (the compiler of the discourse under research clarified 2053 addressees and addressers) of the information, which comes from diverse addressees, different in terms of socio-psychological, cultural-intellectual and other factors, and explicates common and distinct communicative-content filling. It was firstly that the “Letters to Oles Honchar” epistolary appeared to be systemically characterised via the prism of mono-, bi-, and polyaddressability. As a result, the role of the vocative component as a mandatory epistolary attribute, predisposing the discourse formation in general and its contextual fragments in particular, the identification of the genre nature of the letter (primarily, the dichotomy “official / private correspondence”), was deeply examined.

Publisher

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Batsevych, F.S. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoi linhvistyky: pidruchnyk [Fundamentals of communicative linguistics: manual]. Kyiv: Akademiia, 344 (in Ukr.).

2. Batsevych, F.S., Kochan, I. M. (2016). Linhvistyka tekstu: pidruchnyk [Text linguistics: manual]. Lviv: LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 316 (in Ukr.).

3. Bekhta, I. (2011). Prahmanastanova khudozhnoho tekstu i chynnyk adresata: pidruchnyk [Pragmaintention of the literary text and an addressee: manual]. Linhvistyka [Linguistics], 2011, 11 (22), 151–158 (in Ukr.).

4. Honchar, O. (2008). Shchodennyky: u 3 tomakh [Diaries: in 3 volumes] / ed., prep. of texts and illustrative material by V. D. Honchar. Kyiv: Veselka. Vol. 1, 456. Vol. 2, 608. Vol. 3, 648 (in Ukr.).

5. Yeshchenko, T. (2021). Fenomen khudozhnoho tekstu: komunikatyvnyi, semantychnyi i prahmatychnyi aspekty: monohrafiia [The phenomenon of the literary text: communicative, semantic and pragmatic aspects: a monograph]. Lviv: Lviv. nats. med. u-t imeni Danyla Halytskoho, 2021, 470 (in Ukr.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3