Abstract
The rising cost of lime, traditionally used to address soil acidity and its detrimental effects on soil fertility, has prompted the exploration of organic by-products as more affordable alternatives for mitigating soil acidity, particularly for low-income farmers. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate effects of filter cake (FC) and bagasse ash (BA) application on soil acidity under greenhouse condition. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomised design with four replications. The FC and BA were investigated separately each with six levels (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100) t/ha-1. The acidic soil was collected from Imdibir area at a depth of 0-20 cm, air dried, ground and passed through 4 mm sieve. Each pot was received 4 kg of soil with respective treatment material after they were well homogenised. The laboratory analysis revealed that the soil had an initial pH of 5.1, while filter cake and bagasse ash had pH values of 8.0 and 10.2, respectively. Application of FC increased soil pH from 5.1 to 7.3, along with improvements in organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and cation exchange capacity. Similarly, BA application raised pH from 5.1 to 7.4 and enhanced organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and cation exchange capacity. The maximum effects for both FC and BA occurred at the highest application rate (100 t/ha-1), while iron and manganese content increased with BA application but decreased as rates increased, and copper and zinc levels were positively affected by both FC and BA applications. Overall, both FC and BA applications significantly improved soil pH and nutrient content. The findings of this study can provide practical and cost-effective solutions for improving soil fertility and crop production
Publisher
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Reference28 articles.
1. [1] Alabi, D, Coopoosamy, R, Naidoo, K, & Arthur, G (2022) Composted bagasse: An impact on agricultural crop production. Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research, 12, article number 488.
2. [2] Dee, B.M., Haynes, R.J., & Meyer, J.H. (2002). Sugar mill wastes can be important soil amendments. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, 76, 51-60.
3. [3] Demeyer, A., Nkana, J.C., & Verloo, M.G. (2001). Characteristics of wood ash and influence on soil properties and nutrient uptake: An overview. Bioresource Technology, 77(03), 287-295. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00043-2.
4. [4] District Agricultural Office. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sonitpur.assam.gov.in/index.php/departments/district-agricultural-office.
5. [5] Ejersa, M.T. (2021). Causes of soil acidity and its management mechanisms in Ethiopia: A review. Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany, 5(4), article number 054.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献