Author:
Pokidko M. I.,Balabuyeva V. V.,Goncharenko O. V.,Bogachuk M. G.
Abstract
Abstract. The goal is to improve the results of complex treatment of patients with a perforated gastroduodenal ulcer by analyzing the results of treatment using traditional surgical techniques and using minimally invasive, including endoscopic vacuum-associated (E-VAK) interventions. The results of treatment of 287 patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers complicated by perforation, who were treated in the surgical department of the city clinical emergency medical hospital during 2019-2023, were studied. Among gastric ulcers, chronic ulcers were found in 78 (27.2 %) cases, acute – in 34 (11.8 %) cases. There were 132 (46.0 %) chronic duodenal ulcers, 43 (15.0 %) acute ones. At the same time, in total, diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 40 (13.9 %) patients, laparoscopic suturing of the perforating hole was performed in 32 (11.1 %) patients, and 8 (2.8 %) had indications for conversion. In 2 cases (0.69 %) endoscopic vacuum-associated (E-VAC) intervention was used for the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation. 34 (11.8 %) patients underwent laparocentesis with subsequent drainage of the abdominal cavity and peritoneal lavage with decamethoxin solution before surgery. Among the complications in the postoperative period, failure of intestinal sutures was observed in 6 (2.1 %) patients. Postoperative mortality was 12.5 %. The cause of mortality in 27 (77.1 %) patients was the progression of multiple organ failure against the background of the terminal stage of peritonitis. Today, when choosing a method of treatment for a perforated gastroduodenal ulcer, preference should be given to minimally invasive laparoscopic methods before surgery with a laparotomy approach. The use of endoscopic vacuum-associated (E-VAK) interventions, especially in patients with IV-V degree of risk according to the ASA scale, is a promising direction in the treatment of patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcer.
Publisher
Institute of General and Emergency Surgery Named after V.T. Zaitsev NAMS of Ukraine
Reference8 articles.
1. Tutchenko MI, Slonetskyi BI, Ishchur V, Verbytskyi IV. Mistse maloinvazyvnykh tekhnolohii pry khirurhichnomu likuvanni perforatyvnoi vyrazky dvanadtsiatypaloi kyshky. Meditsina neotlozhnykh sostoianii. 2017; 8(87):75-9. DOI: 10.22141/2224-0586.8.87.2017.121327 [In Ukr.]
2. Churpii IK, Churpii KL, Churpii VK, Melnyk IV. Dosvid laparoskopichnoho likuvannia perforatyvnoi vyrazky dvanadtsiatypaloi kyshky. Art of medicine. 2018; 4(8):187-8. https://art-of-medicine.ifnmu.edu.ua/index.php/aom/article/view/75 [In Ukr.]
3. Buck DL, Vester-Andersen M, Moller MH. Danish clinical register of emergency surgery. Surgical delay is a critical determinant of survival in perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg, 2013; 100(8):1045-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9175
4. Kouladouros K. Applications of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract. World Journal of 10.4253/wjge.v15.i6.420
5. Kamada T, Satoh K, Itoh T, Ito M, Iwamoto J, Okimoto T, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021; 56:303-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01769-0