Affiliation:
1. Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India
Abstract
The predisposition of central-incisors and its association with alveolar bone in surrounding area required assessment before any decision for treatment which involves anteroposterior (AP) movement of incisor inside the jaws. To identify anatomic relationship between central incisor roots and alveolar bone thickness in individuals with variable sagittal malocclusions and to also correlate if any sexual dimorphism among samples. The present study was conducted on 100 pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of young adult patients aged 15 to 30 years. They were divided into 2 groups on the basis of Angle’s system of classification as Class I and Class II with 50 subjects each group. patients were selected from the pool of patients who reported to All the lateral cephalograms were hand traced by same operator and tracings included mandibular symphysis, 1 molar central incisors, the OP, incisal edges, root apices, incisor long axes, upper incisor CEJ and upper incisor root midpoint. Various parameters were then measured for both the groups. All data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS version 24.0 Inc, Chicago, IL, USA. Independent sample t-test was used to determine possible statistically significant differences between the Class I and Class II for various parameters. U1-lab was statistically significant increased value in Class I sample, Where as L1-ling was statistically significant increased value in Class II sample. A very small but significant difference was found for the mandibular alveolar bone thickness in males and females in both Class I and Class II samples. A significant variance between alveolar (AV) process of class II and Class I occlusion. There was also a significant variation in males and females of the sample group.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Reference29 articles.
1. Vardimon AD, Oren E, Bassat YB, Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;114(5):520-9
2. Garib DG, Yatabe MS, Ozawa TO, Filho OG Da Silva, Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: defining the biological limits of tooth movement.Dent Press J Orthod 2010;15(5):192-205
3. Kim YS, Cha JY, Yu HS, Hwang CJ, Comparison of mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness in different facial skeletal types.Korean J Orthod 2010;40(5):314-38
4. Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions.Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120(3):201-12
5. Handelman C, The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae.Angle Orthod 1996;66(2):95-110