Affiliation:
1. Full Fact, London, UK
2. University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
3. Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Abstract
In an effort to assist factcheckers in the process of factchecking, we tackle the claim detection task, one of the necessary stages prior to determining the veracity of a claim. It consists of identifying the set of sentences, out of a long text, deemed capable of being factchecked. This article is a collaborative work between Full Fact, an independent factchecking charity, and academic partners. Leveraging the expertise of professional factcheckers, we develop an annotation schema and a benchmark for automated claim detection that is more consistent across time, topics, and annotators than are previous approaches. Our annotation schema has been used to crowdsource the annotation of a dataset with sentences from UK political TV shows. We introduce an approach based on universal sentence representations to perform the classification, achieving an F1 score of 0.83, with over 5% relative improvement over the state-of-the-art methods ClaimBuster and ClaimRank. The system was deployed in production and received positive user feedback.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference45 articles.
1. ACM. 2018. ACM Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics. ACM. 2018. ACM Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics.
2. Detecting breaking news rumors of emerging topics in social media
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献