Affiliation:
1. University of California, Berkeley
2. Dartmouth College
Abstract
The advent of sophisticated photo editing software has made it increasingly easier to manipulate digital images. Often visual inspection cannot definitively distinguish the resulting forgeries from authentic photographs. In response, forensic techniques have emerged to detect geometric or statistical inconsistencies that result from specific forms of photo manipulation. In this article we describe a new forensic technique that focuses on geometric inconsistencies that arise when fake reflections are inserted into a photograph or when a photograph containing reflections is manipulated. This analysis employs basic rules of reflective geometry and linear perspective projection, makes minimal assumptions about the scene geometry, and only requires the user to identify corresponding points on an object and its reflection. The analysis is also insensitive to common image editing operations such as resampling, color manipulations, and lossy compression. We demonstrate this technique with both visually plausible forgeries of our own creation and commercially produced forgeries.
Funder
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems
University of California
Division of Computer and Network Systems
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
Reference48 articles.
1. Adelson E. H. 2000. The New Cognitive Neurosciences 2nd Ed. MIT Press Chapter Lightness Perception and Lightness Illusions 339--351. Adelson E. H. 2000. The New Cognitive Neurosciences 2nd Ed. MIT Press Chapter Lightness Perception and Lightness Illusions 339--351.
2. Seam carving for content-aware image resizing
3. The Venus Effect: People's Understanding of Mirror Reflections in Paintings
4. On what people know about images on mirrors
5. The Perception of Texture on Folded Surfaces
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献