Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis

Author:

Stray Jonathan1ORCID,Halevy Alon2ORCID,Assar Parisa3ORCID,Hadfield-Menell Dylan4ORCID,Boutilier Craig5ORCID,Ashar Amar6ORCID,Bakalar Chloe7ORCID,Beattie Lex6ORCID,Ekstrand Michael8ORCID,Leibowicz Claire9ORCID,Moon Sehat Connie10ORCID,Johansen Sara11ORCID,Kerlin Lianne12ORCID,Vickrey David7ORCID,Singh Spandana7ORCID,Vrijenhoek Sanne13ORCID,Zhang Amy14ORCID,Andrus Mckane9ORCID,Helberger Natali13ORCID,Proutskova Polina12ORCID,Mitra Tanushree15ORCID,Vasan Nina11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UC Berkeley Center for Human-compatible AI, USA

2. Meta AI, USA

3. Adobe Inc. USA

4. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, USA

5. Google Research, USA

6. Spotify Inc., USA

7. Meta Inc., USA

8. Department of Information Science, Drexel University, USA

9. Partnership on AI, USA

10. Hacks/Hackers, USA

11. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, USA

12. BBC, UK

13. Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

14. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, USA

15. Information, School, University of Washington, USA

Abstract

Recommender systems are the algorithms which select, filter, and personalize content across many of the world's largest platforms and apps. As such, their positive and negative effects on individuals and on societies have been extensively theorized and studied. Our overarching question is how to ensure that recommender systems enact the values of the individuals and societies that they serve. Addressing this question in a principled fashion requires technical knowledge of recommender design and operation, and also critically depends on insights from diverse fields including social science, ethics, economics, psychology, policy and law. This paper is a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize theory and practice from different perspectives, with the goal of providing a shared language, articulating current design approaches, and identifying open problems. We collect a set of values that seem most relevant to recommender systems operating across different domains, then examine them from the perspectives of current industry practice, measurement, product design, and policy approaches. Important open problems include multi-stakeholder processes for defining values and resolving trade-offs, better values-driven measurements, recommender controls that people use, non-behavioral algorithmic feedback, optimization for long-term outcomes, causal inference of recommender effects, academic-industry research collaborations, and interdisciplinary policy-making.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference405 articles.

1. Himan Abdollahpouri , Gediminas Adomavicius , Robin Burke , Ido Guy , Dietmar Jannach , Toshihiro Kamishima , Jan Krasnodebski , and Luiz Pizzato . 2020. Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. 30, 1 ( 2020 ), 127–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1 10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1 Himan Abdollahpouri, Gediminas Adomavicius, Robin Burke, Ido Guy, Dietmar Jannach, Toshihiro Kamishima, Jan Krasnodebski, and Luiz Pizzato. 2020. Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. 30, 1 (2020), 127–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1

2. Himan Abdollahpouri and Robin Burke. 2019. Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness. (2019). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.13158 Himan Abdollahpouri and Robin Burke. 2019. Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness. (2019). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.13158

3. Daniel Adiwardana , Minh-Thang Luong , David R. So , Jamie Hall , Noah Fiedel , Romal Thoppilan , Zi Yang , Apoorv Kulshreshtha , Gaurav Nemade , Yifeng Lu , and Quoc V. Le . 2020. Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot. arXiv:2001.09977 [cs, stat] (February 2020) . Retrieved November 30, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09977 Daniel Adiwardana, Minh-Thang Luong, David R. So, Jamie Hall, Noah Fiedel, Romal Thoppilan, Zi Yang, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Gaurav Nemade, Yifeng Lu, and Quoc V. Le. 2020. Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot. arXiv:2001.09977 [cs, stat] (February 2020). Retrieved November 30, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09977

4. David Adkins , Bilal Alsallakh , Adeel Cheema , Narine Kokhlikyan , Emily McReynolds , Pushkar Mishra , Chavez Procope , Jeremy Sawruk , Erin Wang , and Polina Zvyagin . 2022 . Method Cards for Prescriptive Machine-Learning Transparency . Retrieved April 19, 2022 from https://conf.researchr.org/details/cain-2022/cain-2022/12/Method-Cards-for-Prescriptive-Machine-Learning-Transparency David Adkins, Bilal Alsallakh, Adeel Cheema, Narine Kokhlikyan, Emily McReynolds, Pushkar Mishra, Chavez Procope, Jeremy Sawruk, Erin Wang, and Polina Zvyagin. 2022. Method Cards for Prescriptive Machine-Learning Transparency. Retrieved April 19, 2022 from https://conf.researchr.org/details/cain-2022/cain-2022/12/Method-Cards-for-Prescriptive-Machine-Learning-Transparency

5. M. Mehdi Afsar , Trafford Crump , and Behrouz Far . 2021 . Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A survey. arXiv:2101.06286 [cs] (January 2021) . Retrieved August 25, 2021 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06286v1 M. Mehdi Afsar, Trafford Crump, and Behrouz Far. 2021. Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A survey. arXiv:2101.06286 [cs] (January 2021). Retrieved August 25, 2021 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06286v1

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 8–10% of algorithmic recommendations are ‘bad’, but… an exploratory risk-utility meta-analysis and its regulatory implications;International Journal of Information Management;2024-04

2. Exploring users’ desire for transparency and control in news recommender systems: A five-nation study;Journalism;2023-12-18

3. Final Remarks: A Needed Agenda;Algorithmic Institutionalism;2023-12-12

4. Algorithms and Politics;Algorithmic Institutionalism;2023-12-12

5. Algorithmic Recommenders;Algorithmic Institutionalism;2023-12-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3