Trust Measurement in Human-Autonomy Teams: Development of a Conceptual Toolkit

Author:

Krausman Andrea1ORCID,Neubauer Catherine1ORCID,Forster Daniel1ORCID,Lakhmani Shan2ORCID,Baker Anthony L.3ORCID,Fitzhugh Sean M.1ORCID,Gremillion Gregory1ORCID,Wright Julia L.1ORCID,Metcalfe Jason S.1ORCID,Schaefer Kristin E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory

2. US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory

3. US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory Oak Ridge Associated Universities, US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory

Abstract

The rise in artificial intelligence capabilities in autonomy-enabled systems and robotics has pushed research to address the unique nature of human-autonomy team collaboration. The goal of these advanced technologies is to enable rapid decision-making, enhance situation awareness, promote shared understanding, and improve team dynamics. Simultaneously, use of these technologies is expected to reduce risk to those who collaborate with these systems. Yet, for appropriate human-autonomy teaming to take place, especially as we move beyond dyadic partnerships, proper calibration of team trust is needed to effectively coordinate interactions during high-risk operations. But to meet this end, critical measures of team trust for this new dynamic of human-autonomy teams are needed. This article seeks to expand on trust measurement principles and the foundation of human-autonomy teaming to propose a “toolkit” of novel methods that support the development, maintenance, and calibration of trust in human-autonomy teams operating within uncertain, risky, and dynamic environments.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction

Reference277 articles.

1. Lisa C. Abrams, Rob Cross, Eric Lesser, and Daniel Z. Levin. 2003. Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Perspectives 17, 4 (2003), 64–77.

2. Statistical modelling of networked human-automation performance using working memory capacity

3. Shiori Amemiya and Kuni Ohtomo. 2012. Effect of the observed pupil size on the amygdala of the beholders. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7, 3 (2012), 332–341.

4. Neuroelectrical Hyperscanning Measures Simultaneous Brain Activity in Humans

5. David Atkinson, Peter Hancock, Robert R. Hoffman, John D. Lee, Ericka Rovira, Charlene Stokes, and Alan R. Wagner. 2012. Trust in Computers and Robots: The uses and Boundaries of the Analogy to Interpersonal Trust. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3