Affiliation:
1. Inria, Paris, France
2. OCamlPro, Paris, France
3. Université Paris Cité, Inria, CNRS, Paris, France
Abstract
We say that an imperative data structure is
snapshottable
or
supports snapshots
if we can efficiently capture its current state, and restore a previously captured state to become the current state again. This is useful, for example, to implement backtracking search processes that update the data structure during search. Inspired by a data structure proposed in 1978 by Baker, we present a
snapshottable store
, a bag of mutable references that supports snapshots. Instead of capturing and restoring an array, we can capture an arbitrary set of references (of any type) and restore all of them at once. This snapshottable store can be used as a building block to support snapshots for arbitrary data structures, by simply replacing all mutable references in the data structure by our store references. We present use-cases of a snapshottable store when implementing type-checkers and automated theorem provers. Our implementation is designed to provide a very low overhead over normal references, in the common case where the capture/restore operations are infrequent. Read and write in store references are essentially as fast as in plain references in most situations, thanks to a key optimisation we call
record elision
. In comparison, the common approach of replacing references by integer indices into a persistent map incurs a logarithmic overhead on reads and writes, and sophisticated algorithms typically impose much larger constant factors. The implementation, which is inspired by Baker’s and the OCaml implementation of persistent arrays by Conchon and Filliâtre, is both fairly short and very hard to understand: it relies on shared mutable state in subtle ways. We provide a mechanized proof of correctness of its core using the Iris framework for the Coq proof assistant.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference35 articles.
1. The Set Union Problem with Unlimited Backtracking
2. Phil Bagwell. 2001. Ideal Hash Trees. Tech. rep. EPFL. http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/64398.
3. Shallow binding in Lisp 1.5
4. cvc5: A Versatile and Industrial-Strength SMT Solver
5. Michael A. Bender, Richard Cole, Erik D. Demaine, Martin Farach-Colton, and Jack Zito. Sept. 2002. “ Two Simplified Algorithms for Maintaining Order in a List.” In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2002 ) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Vol. 2461. (Sept. 2002 ), 152-164.