Affiliation:
1. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Abstract
This paper surveys the area of biological and genomic sources integration, which has recently become a major focus of the data integration research field. The challenges that an integration system for biological sources must face are due to several factors such as the variety and amount of data available, the representational heterogeneity of the data in the different sources, and the autonomy and differing capabilities of the sources.
This survey describes the main integration approaches that have been adopted. They include warehouse integration, mediator-based integration, and navigational integration. Then we look at the four major existing integration systems that have been developed for the biological domain: SRS, BioKleisli, TAMBIS, and DiscoveryLink. After analyzing these systems and mentioning a few others, we identify the pros and cons of the current approaches and systems and discuss what an integration system for biologists ought to be.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Information Systems,Software
Reference41 articles.
1. The Molecular Biology Database Collection: 2003 update
2. BibFinder. http://kilimanjaro.eas.asu.edu 2004. BibFinder. http://kilimanjaro.eas.asu.edu 2004.
3. BioHavasu. http://phanxipan.eas.asu.edu 2003. BioHavasu. http://phanxipan.eas.asu.edu 2003.
4. BioNavigator Solutions. http://www.bionavigator.com 2003. BioNavigator Solutions. http://www.bionavigator.com 2003.
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献