Affiliation:
1. Singapore Management University, Singapore
2. University of North Texas, United States of America
Abstract
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations play an increasingly important role due to the growing focus on sustainability globally. Entities, such as banks and investors, utilize ESG ratings of companies issued by specialized rating agencies to evaluate ESG risks of companies. The process of assigning ESG ratings by human analysts is however laborious and time intensive. Developing methods to predict ESG ratings could alleviate such challenges, allow ESG ratings to be generated in a more timely manner, cover more companies, and be more accessible. Most works study the effects of ESG ratings on target variables such as stock prices or financial fundamentals of companies, but few works study how different types of company information can be utilized to predict ESG ratings. Previous works also largely focus on using only the financial information of individual companies to predict ESG ratings, leaving out the different types of inter-company relationship networks. Such inter-company relationship networks are typically dynamic, i.e., they evolve across time. In this paper, we focus on utilizing dynamic inter-company relationships for ESG ratings prediction, and examine the relative importance of different financial and dynamic network information in this prediction task. Our analysis shows that utilizing dynamic inter-company network information, based on common director, common investor and news event-based knowledge graph relationships, can significantly improve ESG rating prediction performance. Robustness checks over different time-periods and different number of time-steps in the future further validate these insights.
Funder
National Research Foundation
Monetary Authority of Singapore Postgraduate Scholarship
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
General Computer Science,Management Information Systems
Reference80 articles.
1. [n.d.]. Exploring the G in ESG: Governance in Greater Detail. https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/articles/exploring-the-g-in-esg-governance-in-greater-detail-part-i. Accessed: 2021-12-30.
2. [n.d.]. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (2017). ESG reports and ratings: what they are why they matter. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/27/esg-reports-and-ratings-what-they-are-why-they-matter/. Accessed: 2021-12-30.
3. [n.d.]. Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System. https://www.ngfs.net. Accessed: 2021-12-30.
4. [n.d.]. RapidFuzz - Levenshtein Distance Matching. https://maxbachmann.github.io/RapidFuzz/Usage/distance/Levenshtein.html. Accessed: 2021-12-30.
5. [n.d.]. Regulators turn spotlight on company sustainability ratings. https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/regulators-turn-spotlight-company-sustainability-ratings-2021-07-26/. Accessed: 2021-12-30.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献