Author:
Binder Robert V.,Legeard Bruno,Kramer Anne
Abstract
You have probably heard about MBT (model-based testing), but like many software-engineering professionals who have not used MBT, you might be curious about others’ experience with this test-design method. From mid-June 2014 to early August 2014, we conducted a survey to learn how MBT users view its efficiency and effectiveness. The 2014 MBT User Survey, a follow-up to a similar 2012 survey, was open to all those who have evaluated or used any MBT approach. Its 32 questions included some from a survey distributed at the 2013 User Conference on Advanced Automated Testing. Some questions focused on the efficiency and effectiveness of MBT, providing the figures that managers are most interested in. Other questions were more technical and sought to validate a common MBT classification scheme. A common classification scheme could help users understand both the general diversity and specific approaches. The 2014 survey provides a realistic picture of the current state of MBT practice. This article presents some highlights of the survey findings.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Testing adaptation policies for software components;Software Quality Journal;2020-01-23
2. MobSTer: A model-based security testing framework for web applications;Software Testing, Verification and Reliability;2018-09-27
3. Interactive System Testing;Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems;2018-06-19
4. Testing uncertainty of cyber-physical systems in IoT cloud infrastructures: combining model-driven engineering and elastic execution;Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Testing Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems;2017-07-13
5. References;Model-Based Testing Essentials;2016-04-15